"Start saving some money for a house!"
"You
should get that promotion in 3 years!"
We have been primed
since our childhoods to think in terms of predefined goals. Life is a series of
goals, and once you achieve one, you have another that's waiting inpatiently in
line.
And not achieving
them by the time the deadline knocks on your shoulder, we see as a henious
shame for which universal pitty seems to be the only cure.
Our brains are so
automised in this way of thinking, if it is thinking at all, that we rarely
stop and reflect if these goals are really what we want.
And then the
question is, why do we really want anything at all?
Suppose we answer
this question with "being happy".
But now, what does
that mean?
Is it a reasonable
demand for us to be happy the entire time?
Speaking of
happiness, what is is anyway?
Is it also a goal to
be achieved, that after a series of heroic quests and obstacles can be
attained?
If that would be the
case, happiness would only be a split second, wouldn't it? And the moment you
notice it, it's already gone.
Now let's look at
happiness the opposite way, not as a goal, but as a way of operating. Not one
of extreme joy and ecstasy, but more a habit of finding joy and meaning in whatever is present at a certain moment.
But then you might
reasonably ask, are all situations to be appreciated?
For instance, what
if a man is held up against his will in a concentration camp, could he find
happiness there?
Actually, that is
exactly the situation Dr. Viktor Frankl was in. He's a pyschiatrist whom during
his time in a nazi concentration camp, started to think about how he and his
fellow men could give meaning to their lives in what seemed like an utterly meaningless
situation. There, he developed his "Logotherapy", which is now still
being used to help people find meaning in their suffering (his book "Man's
search for meaning" is highly recommended).
If we define
happiness that way, it seems more like something not beyond the scope of
reason.
So do we get happy,
the way we just defined it, by pursuing these goals, which are imposed on us
and are rarely given any deep analysis?
The thing about you
and me is that we change continously.
Things happen,
foreseen and unforeseen, wonderful or awful. However that means that you might
see the goals you set last month from a different angle today, and you might
even be turned off by the goals that lured you on just a while ago.
So blindly working
towards them without any reflection seems quite foolish.
So wouldn't it be
wiser to think about the intrinsic value you get from the goals you have chosen
to pursue, and then just see where it can get you?
That way, going
through life is very "simple", at least in theory: you have fun, and
then see where this having fun can get you. And when you truly are having fun,
it actually doesn't really matter anyway.
If we keep priming
our children with our ridiculous predefined goals and plans, they might unlearn
their most captivating and important quality, to just have fun.
One thoughtful note occasionally about new episodes or posts you might be interested in, the questions behind the next episode and occasional marginalia.